Verbal and nonverbal components commonly used in talk therapies can enhance the therapeutic value of dialogue. The theory and practice behind these components will be explored and critically debated in relation to the metaphors and their meaning. Encouraging clients to become autonomous and self-managed through increased accountability for the progress of their therapy is an approach that was first introduced by Carl Rogers. in 1951 (Hough 2007). This person-centered approach allows the therapist to play a non-directive role, allowing clients to become their own person and realize their unique potential during therapy sessions (Nelson-Jones 2006). Based on the development of client independence, this approach attempts to remove therapists' interpretation of behaviors associated with psychodynamic therapies (Burnard 2005), thereby promoting growth and development of personal goals. When used in therapeutic contexts, metaphors can be both a powerful and sensitive form of language designed to bring about change in perception and/or behavior (Hutchings 1998). However, as a verbal component of the person-centered approach, metaphors can enhance or inhibit a client's progress. Through the use of these verbal illustrations, clients can explore and understand truths without the “glare” of realism, thereby eliminating stigma and allowing clients to become more sensitive to their own perceptions (Hutchings 1998). It is at this time, where clients feel that therapists are non-judgmental, that goals and responsibilities are most likely to be incentivized (Mallinson et al 1996). However, when using a person-centered approach to therapeutic dialogue, the choice remains with the client as to whether their thoughts and emotions related to the metaphor are explored (Nelson-Jones 2006). This can prevent clients from resolving important issues or events in their lives; here, it may be beneficial for the therapist to adopt a psychodynamic approach to interpreting meanings and conceptualizing chosen metaphors. Kirkin (2007) explored the relationship between metaphors and truth. He said this type of word illusion can be used to obscure the truth and conceal feelings. He also suggested that the interpretation of metaphors was individual and that, although often perceived as powerful by clients, the key principles were not always understood by the therapist (Kirkin 2007). It can therefore be suggested that the use of metaphor in person-centered therapeutic approaches allows freedom and independence in problem solving and goal setting..